REVIEW: With Richard Three, Shakespeare in the Ruff affirms their tradition of re-imagining Shakespeare in powerful ways
iPhoto caption: Photo by Mike McPhaden.
There is a rift in the time-space continuum at Withrow Park this summer: multiverse Richard III has met Shakespearean universe Richard III for a coronation and some Shakespearean hijinks.
In Richard Three, a Shakespeare in the Ruff production created by Patricia Allison, Richard III (Alexia Vassos) is interrupted by the sudden appearance of Other Richard (Allison, filling in for Alex Bulmer the night I attended). Other Richard comes from a less power-hungry and more compassionate parallel universe than the one he has found himself in. Both Richards are disabled, but their worlds have disparate disability cultures, and each universe has fostered disparate attitudes surrounding their capabilities.
Unsure how to get back his less “mean and murder-y” universe, Other Richard helps get Richard III crowned in exchange for his safety and hopefully finding his way back home. Initially, Richard III is less than impressed with his new companion, but once he finds a use for Other Richard, he develops a fondness for him. Everyone Else (multiple characters played by Christine Horne) is blind to the existence of Other Richard, setting up multiple entertaining situations.
In her program note, Allison says that on top of the multiverse Richard concept being cool, it’s a handy way to untangle the idea that Richard III was a monster because of his disability, and reclaim him as a disabled character. Using the idea of multiple universes is a bit of a play on the degenerative multiple sclerosis that Allison lives with, she says in the program note, stating that her reality and expectations of herself evolve with the sclerosing in her brain.
At the risk of oversimplifying a complex history, it’s commonly understood that Richard III was tyrannical and deformed thanks to the work of people like William Shakespeare. When you do a deeper dive into the real-life historical figure, it’s easy to find that he was a good leader, translated the law into English so that all literate citizens had access, set up legal aid, and funded many educational institutions. While he was in fact disabled, the concept of him being deformed with dubious morality was part of a smear campaign by Henry Tudor, the man who ultimately usurped his throne. The superficial takeaway is that he was either disabled and immoral or able-bodied and virtuous, as though disability is a moral failing and any unfavourable decisions made are to be judged accordingly.
Allison, an active member of the disability community, offers a different, needed perspective on the history of Richard III. Working with disabled actors and engaging with disabled consultants (Ophira Calof) provides a nuanced perspective on Shakespeare’s Richard III, and more general commentary on the discourse surrounding documented history, as well as the impact it has on how disabled people see themselves and how they are seen. Richard III was indeed disabled; he worked in a shady profession, was proficient in battle, and also created just policies that were progressive for his time.
The choice to cast differently disabled women as Richard is an effective one. Conversations between the visibly disabled Vassos and the less visibly disabled Allison offer a satisfying way to explore the two basic takes on the complex reality of Richard III from a disability perspective. How do we assess and prioritize the worthiness of bodies? Which is more deserving and morally superior, and who decides? Allison and cast bring the understanding of their lived experiences and deftly unravel the “monstrous” disabled person trope, as well as how that cliche has bled into present day discourse. Vassos steals the show in her humanization of Shakespeare’s Richard III.
Horne, playing all non-Richard characters in the play, shows off her acting chops here, despite making the able-bodied characters seem almost interchangeable. Blurring the able-bodied characters together renders them one-dimensional, only there to push the plot along, secondary to the unique situation the Richards find themselves in. To me, it’s a unique choice that almost serves as commentary on how disabled people are often situated in mainstream stories as devices rather than complex humans.
Amelia Blaine’s set design is satisfyingly simple. Six standing arches of warm LED lights that bracket the walking path through the park, they could easily be permanent installations. Though they aren’t engaged meaningfully until the very end of the play, they give off an aesthetically pleasing, sci-fi wormhole vibe.
Though Richard Three is Allison’s brainchild, I imagine stepping in for Bulmer (as she did for the first half of the run) must have been daunting nonetheless. With some tweaks to incorporate her MS and armed with her “Richard Three field notes” (a copy of the script for both the last minute job and the memory lapses related to MS), she was a great counter to Vassos’s formidable Richard III until Bulmer could re-join the cast.
With Richard Three, Shakespeare in the Ruff continues their tradition of re-imagining Shakespeare in creative and powerful ways.
Richard Three closed on September 3. You can learn more about Shakespeare in the Ruff here.
Intermission reviews are independent and unrelated to Intermission’s partnered content. Learn more about Intermission’s partnership model here.
Robyn Grant-Moran
Robyn Grant-Moran (Métis Nation of Ontario) is a classical singer, writer, and a jack of many trades who has recently met the requirements to call herself a Bachelor of the Fine Arts (thank you, York University and Indspire!). Along with her BFA, she has also completed the Performance Criticism Training Program with Generator, has studied with some beloved Canadian classical singers, and been in a opera or two. Robyn currently resides in Toronto with her tiny adorable rat dog.
LEARN MORE
iPhoto caption: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory production still by Dahlia Katz.
REVIEW: YPT’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is appropriately sweet
Director Thom Allison’s production embraces Charlie’s many incarnations and tones in a slick rendition that’s both fun sugar high and candy overload.
iPhoto caption: The Lion King production still by Matthew Murphy/Disney.
REVIEW: The Lion King offers audiences a cat’s-eye view of sensory delights
Twenty years after The Lion King’s last open-ended Toronto run, Julie Taymor’s directorial and design concepts remain Pride Rock-solid, spilling out from the stage into aisles, balconies, and above the crowd.
iPhoto caption: A Case for the Existence of God production still by Cylla von Tiedemann.
REVIEW: A Case for the Existence of God makes meaning of platonic intimacy
The play’s urgency and strength come from the gentle way it presents male vulnerability and platonic intimacy — for lack of which men may burn themselves, or the rest of us, to the ground.
iPhoto caption: Photo by Mathieu Taillardas.
REVIEW: Feu Mr. Feydeau! takes charming liberties with a famous playwright’s life
Feu Mr. Feydeau! is an effortlessly enjoyable historical fantasy that takes on death, the creative act, and life's bittersweet disappointments.
iPhoto caption: Dead Broke production still by Calvin Petersen.
REVIEW: Comedy-horror hybrid Dead Broke successfully spooks
While the non-horror aspects of the show lean towards the more amateur, the scares are incredibly successful. This show pulls off the theatrical horror with seeming ease: That’s reason enough to check it out for yourself.
iPhoto caption: What the Constitution Means to Me production still by Dahlia Katz.
REVIEW: What the Constitution Means to Me froths with urgency
Despite the surprisingly intimate nature of the material, I found myself more impressed than moved by this show. It’s one of those pieces that slowly reveals itself as theatrical premises strip away, and perhaps it’s the extra layers of distance and biography that for me kept the material at an emotional distance.
iPhoto caption: Festival artwork by Mishiikenh Kwe.
Weesageechak Begins to Dance invites artists and audiences to explore newness together
Weesageechak Begins to Dance is the annual festival of new and innovative First Nations, Métis, and Inuit theatre, opening on November 6 at Native Earth Performing Arts.
REVIEW: Otîhêw at Shakespeare in Action
A volcanic eruption and violent colonial expansion has turned the world upside down. Without sun and moon, the realities of famine and smallpox unleash new fears that threaten to unravel the fabric of community.
iPhoto caption: Joelle Peters (left) and Tara Sky (right). Original images of Peters and Sky by Ted Belton.
Change for the Better: On Indigeneity at the Stratford Festival
Both [Sky and Peters] want to honour the Indigenous artists who have worked with the [Stratford] festival for years, quietly carving out space for public and visual representation.
iPhoto caption: Courtenay Stevens, Helen Belay, Brandon McGibbon, Courtney Ch’ng Lancaster perform in The 39 Steps. Photo by Sarah Kirby.
REVIEW: The 39 Steps at County Stage Company
A cast of fantastic actors takes you on an equally fantastic journey through some of the silliest places and situations — it’s great fun.
iPhoto caption: Photo by David Hou
REVIEW: Women of the Fur Trade at the Stratford Festival
Louis Riel is SO dreamy. Tall. A little disheveled and unkempt, because he’s an introspective poet who’s busy fighting for social justice. And he wears glasses. He’s the total package.
Survivor on film deepens the humanity of the central character, and how the legacy of residential schools impacts every moment of the survivor's life.
Comments